Why I Embraced Ethical Pessimism After Reading Roy Scranton’s Climate Philosophy

When optimism becomes dangerous and only brutal honesty can save us from civilizational collapse

After finishing Roy Scranton’s groundbreaking work Impasse: Climate Change and the Limits of Progress, I found myself confronting the most uncomfortable truth of our time: that the very optimism we’ve been taught to cherish might be accelerating our march toward civilizational collapse. As someone who has spent years analyzing complex systems and believing in human problem-solving capabilities, this philosophical earthquake has fundamentally transformed how I approach climate change, progress, and the future of humanity.

The Dangerous Delusion of Climate Optimism

Climate change isn’t a problem we can solve—it’s a reality we must endure

For decades, we’ve been sold a comforting narrative about climate change: if we just innovate enough, regulate enough, or care enough, we can solve this crisis and return to “normal.” But the data tells a starkly different story. Global temperatures are tracking toward 4°C above pre-industrial levels by 2100—possibly as early as the 2060s. This isn’t just warming; it’s a fundamental transformation that makes our current civilization impossible to sustain.

Despite three decades of climate warnings since 1990, global emissions continue climbing relentlessly. Since 1945, carbon dioxide levels have risen by three-quarters of humanity’s total historical impact in just three human generations. Vehicle numbers exploded from 40 million to 850 million worldwide, while plastic production skyrocketed from 1 million to 300 million tons annually. Most shocking of all: fossil fuel energy consumption spiked by 3,000 percent during this period.

These numbers reveal what Scranton calls humanity’s most dangerous blind spot: our material progress stems not from moral advancement, but from burning through Earth’s carbon reserves at unprecedented speed. What we celebrate as civilizational achievement is actually temporary wealth extraction that’s destroying the systems that sustain us.

The Psychology Behind Our Climate Denial

Why optimism bias prevents us from seeing reality clearly

Research reveals that approximately 80 percent of mentally healthy people systematically overestimate their control over outcomes and expect unrealistically positive results. This optimism bias—hardwired into our neural architecture—helped our ancestors survive in small tribal groups but becomes catastrophically dangerous when applied to planetary-scale challenges.

A landmark 1979 psychological experiment perfectly illustrates this problem. Students attempted to control a flashing green light using a button. Non-depressed participants dramatically overestimated their influence over the light, while mildly depressed students accurately assessed their actual control. The takeaway is sobering: maintaining mental health often requires seeing the world less clearly than it actually is.

This explains why climate optimism feels so natural and climate realism feels so disturbing. We’re literally programmed to expect better outcomes than reality supports, making us systematically underestimate climate risks and overestimate our ability to manage them. Young people, despite being most affected by climate change, show particularly high levels of climate anxiety and pessimistic future planning—suggesting those closest to the problem see it most clearly.

When Moral Frameworks Collapse

Why traditional ethics can’t handle climate complexity

Scranton masterfully demonstrates how our standard moral frameworks crumble when applied to climate change. Consider philosopher Peter Singer’s utilitarian approach: if you’d save a drowning child despite muddy shoes, you’re equally obligated to save starving children in Bangladesh. Distance shouldn’t matter morally—but this abstract global citizenship ignores how local context shapes meaningful action.

Conversely, biologist Garrett Hardin’s “lifeboat ethics” treats nations like isolated survivors who must let others drown to preserve themselves. Yet countries aren’t isolated—drought in one region affects bread prices globally through interconnected systems.

The temporal contradictions are equally paralyzing. Should poor countries be allowed to pollute more to achieve development parity, even if it dooms the global climate? Or should we demand immediate zero emissions, effectively freezing historical inequalities that favor wealthy nations already positioned for transition?

Even well-intentioned climate justice messaging backfires. The mantra “those who contributed least will suffer most” was designed to inspire privileged action. Instead, it may have reassured elites they’ll remain safe due to their wealth, reinforcing dangerous lifeboat mentality rather than motivating sacrifice.

Learning from Historical Collapse

Indigenous wisdom for navigating civilizational endings

Scranton draws profound wisdom from Native American Crow Chief Plenty-Coups, whose prophetic childhood dream foresaw the collapse of his people’s way of life. In this vision, buffalo disappeared and mighty trees fell in a great storm, leaving only one tree standing—sheltering a small chickadee that survived when all the powerful eagles and hawks perished.

When American expansion destroyed Crow civilization in the late 1800s, Plenty-Coups used this dream to guide his people’s survival. He didn’t cling to the past, attempt to control the uncontrollable, or pretend nothing had changed. Instead, he embraced “radical hope”—commitment to future survival without knowing what form it would take.

This ancient approach directly challenges our modern addiction to progress narratives. Thomas Malthus, dismissed as heartlessly pessimistic, actually witnessed devastating famines in 1790s Britain where hungry mobs surrounded the King’s carriage demanding bread. His warnings about natural limits weren’t cruelty—they were hard-earned lessons about what happens when optimistic theories meet stubborn reality.

Defining Ethical Pessimism

A framework for meaningful action amid civilizational collapse

Ethical pessimism, as Scranton defines it, isn’t despair or nihilism. It’s the recognition of human limits combined with unwavering commitment to moral action despite uncertainty. This philosophical framework acknowledges that some problems cannot be solved, only endured with grace and mutual care.

The approach demands intellectual honesty about our “catastrophic trajectory” while accepting that the future remains fundamentally unknowable. Rather than pursuing impossible solutions, ethical pessimism focuses on what we can actually control: minimizing harm where possible, preparing communities for disruption, and building mutual aid networks that don’t depend on failed systems.

This isn’t giving up—it’s seeing clearly enough to act effectively. When we abandon false hope, we paradoxically discover genuine hope: the possibility of living ethically amid uncertainty, caring for each other despite not knowing what tomorrow brings. Like the chickadee in Plenty-Coups’s dream, survival depends not on strength or optimism, but on our ability to listen, learn, and adapt to radically changed conditions.

The Philosophical Foundations

From Malthus to modern ecological pessimism

Contemporary ecological pessimism builds on centuries of philosophical groundwork. David Benatar’s antinatalist philosophy mathematically demonstrates how existence involves more suffering than pleasure, yet we continue choosing engagement with life because meaning transcends rational calculation. Similarly, climate pessimism doesn’t counsel despair but rather honest engagement with difficult realities.

Toby Svoboda’s recent work A Philosophical Case for Ecological Pessimism provides rigorous defense of pessimistic attitudes toward environmental catastrophe. Unlike climate denial or technological optimism, ecological pessimism acknowledges high probability of massive ecological harm while maintaining commitment to whatever mitigation remains possible.

The key insight is that being pessimistic about ecological prospects remains compatible with what philosophers call the “melioristic project”—working to improve our bad condition even when fundamental solutions seem impossible. Environmental philosophy becomes a way of life emphasizing virtue and spiritual exercises rather than false promises of technological salvation.

Living with Climate Paradox

Holding hope and despair simultaneously

The 2017 Paul Schrader film First Reformed captures the essence of climate paradox. Environmental activist Michael poses a haunting question to a pastor: “What do you tell a child in 2050 when she says ‘You knew all along, didn’t you?’” The film’s ending breaks its own narrative logic, offering transcendent hope alongside relentless pessimism—revealing that we must hold contradictory truths simultaneously without letting either dominate completely.

This paradoxical stance—what some call “hopeful pessimism”—offers genuine advantages over both naive optimism and paralyzing despair. It forces us to see the world as it actually is rather than as we wish it were. It builds resilience by helping distinguish realistic goals from impossible dreams. Most importantly, recognizing shared suffering and human limits fosters compassion and egalitarian thinking.

Ursula K. Le Guin’s story “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” illustrates the moral complexity of impossible situations. In this tale, a utopian city’s happiness depends entirely on one child’s suffering in a basement. Some citizens walk away in moral protest, but this doesn’t help the child and may lead nowhere. The story reveals how our wealth inherently depends on others’ suffering, with no clean escape from complicity.

Practical Implications for Climate Action

What ethical pessimism means for environmental activism

Embracing ethical pessimism doesn’t mean abandoning climate action—it means pursuing more honest and effective approaches. Instead of promoting technological fixes that maintain current systems, we focus on building community resilience and mutual aid networks. Rather than promising solutions that preserve current lifestyles, we prepare for managed decline and adaptation.

This philosophical shift has profound implications for climate communication. Research shows fear-based messaging, when combined with actionable responses, actually motivates more effective behavior change than positive messaging that often promotes dangerous complacency. The dramatic warning labels on cigarette packages successfully reduced tobacco use precisely because they honestly communicated risks.

Climate activism guided by ethical pessimism prioritizes local resilience over global solutions, community preparation over technological salvation, and honest assessment over false hope. This doesn’t mean despair—it means realistic engagement with the magnitude of transformation already underway.

The Future of Climate Philosophy

Moving beyond the impasse

Scranton’s Impasse represents a crucial evolution in climate thinking, moving beyond the failed optimism-pessimism binary toward what he calls “ethical pessimism”. This framework acknowledges that climate change has already exceeded our comprehension and management abilities through traditional political means or good-faith activism.

The path forward requires abandoning our faith in progress and embracing philosophical alternatives that help us live meaningfully amid collapse. We must learn to hold both hope and despair simultaneously, focusing on what we can control while building mutual aid for an uncertain future.

As someone deeply influenced by Scranton’s work, I’ve come to see ethical pessimism not as defeat but as the most honest foundation for meaningful action in our unprecedented era. By accepting our limits, we open space for whatever genuine possibilities remain—and perhaps most importantly, we preserve our capacity to care for each other as the familiar world dissolves around us.

The climate crisis demands this level of intellectual honesty. The stakes are too high, and the time too short, for comforting delusions about technological salvation or inevitable progress. Only by embracing ethical pessimism can we navigate what Scranton calls our current “impasse” with the wisdom and grace our situation requires.

Essential Reading on Climate Reality and Philosophical Pessimism

If you found this exploration of ethical pessimism compelling, these works will deepen your understanding of climate philosophy and the limits of optimistic thinking:

Core Climate Philosophy:

Philosophical Pessimism:

Climate Psychology and Communication:

Note: Links are affiliate links that support continued research and writing on climate philosophy and environmental ethics.

References

  • http://www.publishersweekly.com/9781503640030
  • https://www.sup.org/books/impasse
  • https://www.seopital.co/blog/the-best-climate-change-seo-keywords
  • https://royscranton.net/books/impasse-climate-change-and-the-limits-of-progress/
  • https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623003659
  • https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8265714/
  • https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12207113/
  • https://natcen.ac.uk/pessimism-profit-and-uncertainty-how-we-view-overcoming-climate-challenges
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Essay_on_the_Principle_of_Population
  • https://philarchive.org/archive/SVOAPC
  • https://lithub.com/embracing-ethical-pessimism-in-the-face-of-near-certain-climate-doom/
  • https://www.routledge.com/A-Philosophical-Case-for-Ecological-Pessimism/Svoboda/p/book/9781032944012
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Better_Never_to_Have_Been
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Benatar
  • https://www.theatlantic.com/books/archive/2025/01/case-for-sisyphus-and-hopeful-pessimism/681356/
  • https://www.diacriticsjournal.com/embracing-pessimism-amidst-collapse-an-interview-with-roy-scranton/
  • https://keywordseverywhere.com/ctl/top/climate-change-keywords
  • https://philpapers.org/rec/NORPAO
  • https://www.resilience.org/stories/2025-09-08/review-impasse-by-roy-scranton/
  • https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1579995
  • https://thebaffler.com/latest/apocalypse-24-7-scranton
  • https://laviedesidees.fr/Climate-Hope
  • https://graham.uchicago.edu/event/book-discussion-roy-scranton-on-impasse/
  • https://atkinson.cornell.edu/blog/climate-optimist-or-pessimist/
  • https://kellogg.nd.edu/ethical-pessimism-climate-change-and-limits-narrative

References

  • https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(24)00229-8/fulltext